|
|
|
| Digital radio via satellite |
| Satellite Receivers |
| UK satellite radio bit rates | UK satellite HDTV bit rates | UK satellite TV bit rates |
| Broadband Internet Radio |
| Internet Radio |
| Wi-Fi Internet radios |
| Introduction to Wi-Fi radios |
| Multicast - radio at high quality |
![]()
| Commercial radio groups call 2015 FM switch-off plans "ridiculous", "farcical" & "complete fantasy"9th November 2009 Three commercial radio groups have broken ranks with the rest of the radio industry to campaign against the Government's plans to switch off FM stations in 2015, which they've described as being "ridiculous", "farcical" and "complete fantasy". The commercial groups opposed to the switchover plans are TalkSport-owner UTV Radio, along with UKRD and The Local Radio Company (TLRC), and it was the chief executive of the latter two groups, William Rogers, who made the following excellent quotes on the subject:
The first person to air his views on the subject, however, was Scott Taunton, the chief executive of UTV Radio, in an interview with the Mediaguardian:
The Government's fake FM switch-off dateThe views of both of the above chief executives are absolutely spot on: no-one in the DAB industry actually believes that it is possible to switch off FM stations in 2015, and it is completely accurate to describe the date as being "ridiculous", "farcical" and "complete fantasy". And William Rogers was also correct about the radio industry lurching from one idiotic position on the digital issue to the next. The reason why the Government set a fake 2015 switch-off date was simply to grab consumers' attention so that they would buy audio equipment that contained DAB instead of equipment that only contained FM/AM (the vast majority of audio equipment sold today that contains a radio tuner still only supports FM/AM), and because it would help the broadcasters persuade the consumer electronics manufacturers to add DAB to more of their products. Furthermore, after the Government set a switch-off date for analogue TV, this led to a huge increase in sales of digital TV set-top boxes, so the Government (and the DAB industry, because it was the DAB industry that recommended that Government should set a ridiculously early FM switch-off date) was hoping that this would happen for DAB as well. So, in theory, the fake switch-off date was simply a ploy to increase DAB sales, and there was no actual possibility that FM stations would be switched off in 2015.
Negative DAB sales in Q3 2009 Things didn't quite go to plan, though, because according to the
the audience measurement body RAJAR, the total number of DAB radios
in the
UK actually went down by 2% in Q3 2009 (the number of DAB
radios will be proportional to the number of households that
have a DAB radio):
What the above figure does undoubtedly show, however, is that DAB sales in the third quarter of this year will definitely have been incredibly low. In case the hapless DAB industry isn't clear about the situation -- which is quite possible, because their decision to adopt DAB in the late 1990s without first upgrading it to include the AAC audio codec (which was standardised in 1997) was the most incompetent technical decision in the history of UK broadcasting -- one idea would be for each of them to write "negative sales = not good" on their foreheads so that when they speak face-to-face with other members of the DAB industry it'll remind them that positive sales are what they should be aiming for if they want to switch off FM at some point this century.
Total DAB sales required for FM switch-offJust to show just how ridiculous an idea it is that FM stations could be switched off in 2015, the following graphs show the number of DAB receivers sold to date, along with how many receivers would need to be sold over the next 6 years. All DAB receiversOfcom estimated that there are 120m - 150m FM devices in-use the UK, and Scott Taunton quoted a figure of 180m receivers in-use. So the first graph uses 150m, which is the mid-point of those figures for the target number of FM devices that need to be replaced (straight-line graphs have been used for simplicity).
About 10m DAB receivers have been sold so far, and the annual DAB sales for both 2007 and 2008 were 2m. Yet in order to reach 150m total sales by the end of 2015 they'd have to sell 21.7m receivers on average per year. I think I'm right in saying that that's more per year than the total number of Freeview set-top boxes or integrated digital TVs that have been sold since 2002, and Freeview was considered to be very successful. Clearly, then, it is ridiculous, farcical, completely fantasy and utter lunacy to suggest that it is possible that FM could be switched off in 2015. In-car DABAnd the situation is even worse for in-car DAB. For starters, there's no way on earth that 900,000 cars have got DAB today, and the DAB industry will simply have fed Scott Taunton with one of their famous hugely exaggerated figures. The DAB industry itself said that 150,000 cars had DAB by the end of 2007, so on average only 25,000 cars were getting DAB each year up to 2007. But for 900,000 cars to have DAB today, as they claim, that would mean that 375,000 cars have got DAB on average per year over the last 2 years -- a jump in sales by a whopping 1,500%, which is clearly complete fantasy. But anyway, let's assume that Fantasy Island figure is correct: the following figure shows how steep the change would need to be for all the 30m cars on the road to get DAB by 2015. Again, it's simply preposterous to suggest that FM switch-off is possible by 2015 given the task ahead.
The overall situation was best summed up by the BBC's Director of Radio, Tim Davie, who said earlier this year that digital radio switchover "may not happen in our lifetime" due to DAB's sales figures being so low. Why Tim Davie had already recommended to Government that they should set an early FM switch-off date before he made that comment is another matter. Hopefully, Mr Davie will one day explain why he chose to do that when he knew full well that the public would be opposed to the idea of switching off FM, and why he didn't consult with the public about this issue either. Overall, though, FM stations won't be switched off until around
2020 - 2025, by which time the Internet will be the biggest digital
radio platform globally, albeit that the BBC's TV advertising will
see to it that the UK public will end up predominantly listening via
DAB+. Because that's what the BBC wants. Comments
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have a DAB/FM tuner in one room, but the DAB reception is so poor, and the FM so vastly superior in sound quality, I decided not to waste my money on another.
The plan to stop FM radio in 2015 benefits nobody.
Its a joke frankly and whilst the similarities with TV are being tumpeted by HMG, the reality is, even static devices like my Hi-fi cant get a decent signal outside of major cities, what hope for cars, portable radios etc?
I hope this policy is thrown where it deserves to be....the shredder.
Digital Radio
This is not environmental because of all the old radios that will have to be scrapped wasting resources and it isn't as good anyway
I am 100% against this unnecessary, the only digital radio we have is very poor in comparison qualitywise.
regards
DAB
Car Sat Nav / FM Radio
Who would pay for any new equipment and the fitting.
My one and only DAB Evoke - 2xt is good but the reception and availability of stations is terrible. I can get far more stations from the Roberts FM Alarm Radio with a short wire trailing.
Which Government Department is wasting our money on this useless project. One for Mr Cameron to disband NOW! Simples!
Lo Fi!
This might be the case if broadcasters adopted the MPEG layer 2 codec at 256 Kbit/sec for good stereo. Unfotunately I know of no U.K. broadcaster using these parameters,they use much lower bit rates, bad compression being the outcome.
The result is that "old fashioned" FM STEREO is still superior!
Listen via a decent audio system [I dislke the term HI FI].
Set both DAB & FM to say Radio 1 or 2 [depending on your preferece] HEAR THE DIFFERENCE!
DAB radio has it's place it has many features & benefits but sound quality at present, is not one of them.
Then the other factors...
The obscene waste ditching perfectly good radios.
Only AM reception on car radios, along with the loss of FM active traffic information
The battery waste created by the high proportion portable DAB radios [ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION THEY REQUIRE MORE POWER].
DAB coverage & reception issues.
I could rant on at length!!! zzzzzzzzzzz
LONG LIVE FM!
Let's not forget all waves are analogue, converted to digital as required!! Analogue radio waves (not to forget thet Telvision signals are also radio waves)can be read through interference, digital is either 'there or not there'. Is the BBC and HMG telling me that it's tough luck if I am driving through a none reception area and digital disappears just at the moment I am about to discover who done it. Oh I suppose I could call into the local Library and catch up using their computer, as long as it is open or they will allow it! At least with Frequency Modulation, if I am listening in to stereo-phonic and lose the signal I can switch to mono-phonic. Likewise should I be watching
analogue tv and signal strength is reduced, audio and a reduced quality picture is still present! 'Pictue blocking' and 'freeze frame' together with the need to re-tune 'The Box' get right up my nose, so I refuse to watch digital television. Will I need to retune all my pre-set digital transmitter stations when travelling or can I just retune one??? if they switch off analogue. AM amature, short, medium and long wave did not disappear with the introduction of FM, why should they suffer because of DAB. At present if a programme not available on FM it can be listened to on Long wave, for instance Cricket. It seems to me we will no longer have the option and will have to accept that which the Dictatorial Bodies decide and I still have to pay their wages through tax and broadcast licencing. I wonder how legal that is as I do not broadcast anything!! Need I go on?
Dab
OUT OF SYNCH
about :
(i) how many DAB radios experience different time delays which are slightly
different to each other due to the variations in the manufacturer's
equipment (chips etc.) and the time each takes to process the data.
(ii) the possibility of broadcasting programmes early so the time signal is
on time !!! I ask you ...............
How can you make sure the time signal is the same for each radio if they
are all putting out programmes at slightly different times ? Only one or
two will be precise, the rest will still be wrong. He has shot his own
solution in the foot with his first statement.
ALL THE MORE REASON TO KEEP FM !!
FM & AM(MW& LW) will always cover more areas of the country than DAB and
the BBC will run out of licence fee payers money on DAB transmitters long
before it has achieved anywhere near the same coverage. The sound will
therefore continue to break up on car journeys through difficult terrain
and in certain cases there will be no signal whatsoever such as mountainous
areas, rural and low coastal areas. I cannot believe the BBC will ever be
able to afford enough money to fill in all the reception gaps. Why do you
think it is that the majority of car manufacturers will not touch DAB with
a barge pole. I had a DAB car radio in 2003 and did not bother to transfer
it when I sold my car. I much preferred FM both in terms of sound quality
and coverage. BBC Radio 4 DAB still switches to mono at various times
throughout the week leaving FM, FreeSat Freeview and the i-player the only
way to hear the programme in (((STEREO))). The bit rates are very poor on
DAB. BBC World Service sounds much better on BBC Radio 4 FM overnight than
DAB. BBC Radio 5 Live sounds better on BBC Radio Cymru FM overnight than
its DAB channel and even BFBS Radio 2 in Cyprus relays BBC Radio 5 Live in
better audio quality at certain times of day than we hear it here in the UK
!! Cannot the government allow the BBC another multiplex to at least up the
bit rates.
BBC Radio 7 DAB has always been in mono since it began whereas on Digital
TV and on line it is in (((STEREO)), a ludicrous situation for a RADIO
channel.
FM has a much rounder sound retaining higher and lower frequencies which
DAB seems to chop off.
No point introducing DAB+ so soon after DAB as this will make all current
DAB radios and tuners redundant having had no life to speak of !!
DAB Switchover
Given the nature of radio propagation,an analogue radio will give reception of stations outside of the uk and still remain totally portable.
Look at the amount of radios that are still being sold which picks up medium,short and fm wavebands(some still have longwave capability)you can listen to the world on some of these.
For high quality radio,I have found the satellite system to be far superior to any dab stations and offering much more variety of programmes.
Put this 20 year old dab radio system where it belongs,on the scrapheap.