DAB sounds worse than FM

Planning for the future of digital radio
 
Quality of BBC Internet radio streams to overtake DAB

Home
 
DAB/DAB+
 
Digital 
Satellite
Freeview
 
DRM
 
Internet 
Radio
Tech
 
Software
Downloads
DAB 
Samples
Newsletter
 
Contact
 Us
Introduction to DAB
Incompetent adoption of DAB
When will FM be switched off?
BBC DAB Multiplex
Digital Radio Bit Rates
Wasted DAB Capacity
DAB Around the World
Design of DAB
DAB vs DAB+ technology
T-DMB vs DAB+
Coverage Maps
DAB Summary
 
DAB Radios
DAB CD Portable Stereos
DAB Personal Radios
DAB Micro Systems
DAB Clock Radios
Digital radio via satellite
Satellite Receivers
UK satellite radio bit rates
UK satellite HDTV bit rates
UK satellite TV bit rates
Internet Radio
Broadband Internet Radio
Audio Advice
Aerials
MPEG Audio Coding
Bit Rate vs Audio Quality
MP2 vs AAC+
Audio Processing
FEC Coding
OTA software upgrades
COFDM
Analogue vs Digital Radio
Bandwidth
RF Carriers
Sampling
RF Antennas
Links
         
 

Ofcom criticises France for not allowing use of DAB+


4th October 2007

France is planning to mandate the use of the T-DMB system for its digital radio system even though T-DMB was designed to carry mobile TV channels rather than radio stations, and Ofcom has sent a document to the French authorities criticising France's decision because it is concerned that it "will in practice prevent other standards from being used in France, affecting both French consumers as well as consumers from other EU countries"; that receivers will need to be produced that can decode audio and video when obviously only audio is required for a radio station; and that the use of T-DMB when DAB+ was expected to be used across Europe will reduce economies of scale for the manufacturers, leading to both DAB+ and T-DMB receivers being more expensive as a result. One additional negative thing about mandating the use of T-DMB that Ofcom didn't mention is that as all radio stations would have an attached video stream (it's only low frame rate, so it's not true video) this will increase the power consumption of receivers unnecessarily. Other reasons why France adopting DMB is a bad idea is that it is inefficient compared to DAB+ and that it doesn't support all the features you would expect from a digital radio system. Some have likened France adopting T-DMB to France going it alone and adopting the SECAM system for analogue TV instead of falling into line with other European countries and adopting the PAL system.

 

Ofcom's preferred approach

The following is a quote from the Ofcom document detailing their preferred approach:

 

Ofcom recognises that the original technical specification for DAB, which is currently the basis for UK digital sound broadcasting, has been superseded by newer technology. We believe that the DAB+ specification now agreed through ETSI offers improved sound quality and spectral efficiency as well as additional services, and is highly suitable for sound-oriented services and the devices designed to receive them. Manufacturers are now building support for DAB+ into new receiver models in the expectation that this will be the common standard for sound-oriented services in the future.

 

and they suggest that it would be preferable to allow DAB+ services to be broadcast alongside DMB services in the same multiplex, as this would providing the following advantages:

 

  1. Receivers would work across borders in countries that had adopted DAB+ (assuming the frequency band is common)
  2. Receivers that only had a DAB+ software stack could just decode the DAB+ part of the multiplex
  3. Receivers with DMB software would only decode DMB service elements
  4. Receivers with both could decode both DAB+ and DMB services.

 

DMB vs DAB+

The DAB+ and DMB standards are virtually identical apart from the fact that DMB requires a video stream to be transmitted alongside each audio stream, whereas DAB+ was specifically designed to carry audio streams. So as they're so similar it is possible for the same receiver modules to support both DAB+ and DMB, and the DAB receiver module companies (Frontier-Silicon and Radioscape) are planning to support DMB as well as DAB+ for modules being sold in France. Therefore, sales of DMB receivers in France will help with the economies of scale for DAB+ modules, which will reduce DAB+ receiver prices to a certain extent.

However, the fragmentation of the receiver market will lead to a lack of economies of scale, which will keep DAB+ receiver prices higher than they would have been, and DMB receiver prices in France will be very high at first because there will be zero volume due to their digital radio service being launched from scratch -- I'm afraid it serves them right that their receiver prices will be so high if they're going to ignore everybody else and go it alone...