digitalradiotech.co.uk

 

BBC1 & BBC2 TV channels now streaming live online
BBC is trying to avoid using 128 kbps AAC for live Internet radio streams
BBC has begun testing higher bit rates for the live Internet streams
Updated
Some BBC stations' listen again streams now at higher quality
Home DAB/DAB+ Internet radio Satellite Freeview DRM Technology Downloads DAB Samples Newsletter Contact Us
Introduction to DAB
Incompetent adoption of DAB
When will FM be switched off?
BBC DAB Multiplex
Digital Radio Bit Rates
Wasted DAB Capacity
DAB Around the World
Design of DAB
DAB vs DAB+ technology
T-DMB vs DAB+
Coverage Maps
DAB Summary
 
DAB Radios
DAB CD Portable Stereos
DAB Personal Radios
DAB Micro Systems
DAB Clock Radios
Digital radio via satellite
Satellite Receivers
UK satellite radio bit rates
UK satellite HDTV bit rates
UK satellite TV bit rates
Broadband Internet Radio
Internet Radio
Wi-Fi Internet radios
Introduction to Wi-Fi radios
Multicast - radio at high quality
Audio Advice
Aerials
MPEG Audio Coding
Bit Rate vs Audio Quality
MP2 vs AAC+
Audio Processing
FEC Coding
OTA software upgrades
COFDM
Analogue vs Digital Radio
Bandwidth
RF Carriers
Sampling
RF Antennas
Links
         

 

 

 

What difference will DAB+ make?


27th November 2006

DAB+, the unofficial name for DAB now that it's adopted the AAC+ codec, will provide the following improvements compared to what DAB offers at present:

 

1. Far more stations

DAB+ is four-times more efficient than the old DAB system is. This translates into either four-times as many stations being transmitted, or higher audio quality, or a combination of both. Ignoring the issue of audio quality for a moment, one thing is almost certain is that using AAC+ will result in far more radio stations transmitting on DAB, and thus the current, in my opinion, relatively poor breadth of choice available on DAB will be much improved, and hopefully we will see the smaller niches catered for, which currently there is no room for, as well as the fact that the transmission costs are prohibitive for smaller stations with the old DAB system.

 

2. The audio quality will be far better overall than it is today

The bit rate levels needed to provide good audio quaity using AAC+ are so low that it will be easy and cheap for radio stations to provide good audio quality. One of the main problems with using the old MP2 audio codec has been that the transmission costs required to provide high audio quality are ridiculously high, and this has militated against the broadcasters providing good audio quality.

For example, the BBC in particular is very likely to provide high audio quality with AAC+, because they are not expected to be able to launch any new stations, or if they are allowed to launch any new stations it will only be one or two at most, because the commercial radio groups would throw their toys out of the pram if they were allowed to launch any more stations than that.

Here's a possible BBC national multiplex configuration using the expected PL4A error protection level:

 

Station Bit Rate
kbps
Audio codec2 Audio mode Audio quality Capacity Units
(CU)
Radio 1 1321 AAC Stereo + Surround Almost CD-quality 72
Radio 2 1321 AAC Stereo + Surround Almost CD-quality 72
Radio 3 1321 AAC Stereo + Surround Almost CD-quality 72
Radio 4 1021 AAC Stereo + Surround Almost CD-quality 56
Radio 5 64 HE-AAC Stereo Very good quality 36
Radio 5 Sports Extra 64 HE-AAC Stereo Very good quality 36
6 Music 1321 AAC Stereo + Surround Almost CD-quality 72
BBC7 721 HE-AAC Stereo + Surround Very good quality 40
1Xtra 1321 AAC Stereo + Surround Almost CD-quality 72
Asian Network 64 HE-AAC Stereo Very good quality 36
World Service 64 HE-AAC Stereo Very good quality 36
Data services 480 - - - 264
Total 1544 864

1 - the bit rate includes the bit rate for the MPEG Surround stream data, which is around 3 - 4 kbps

2 - AAC (LC-AAC), which is the audio codec used on iTunes and for the iPod, is used for higher bit rates and HE-AAC (High-Efficiency AAC) is used at lower bit rates, but is ideal for stereo speech

 

As you can see from the data services bit rate of 480 kbps, the BBC will be able to easily provide very good audio quality on all services, and provide MPEG Surround on all of the stations that would benefit from it, and provide all the currently mono stations in stereo with about a third of the capacity left over. Furthermore, the BBC has said in responses to public consultations that it would like to improve the audio quality of its stations on DAB, so I don't even consider it to be a realistic proposition that the BBC won't improve the audio quality of its stations.

I would also expect the more popular commercial radio stations to use bit rate levels that provide far better audio quality than they're currently provided at — using AAC+ they have to go down to ridiculously low bit rate levels like below 32 kbps before they provide the same level of audio quality as is currently provided on DAB where 98% of stereo stations use 128 kbps with the highly inefficient MP2 audio codec.

Overall, it is basically assured that the audio quality on DAB using AAC+ will be far better than it is at present.

 

3. Better reception quality

This is explained in the DAB vs DAB+ technology article, so I won't repeat it here, but suffice it to say that reception quality will be a lot more robust than it is now.

 

4. MPEG Surround

As well as DAB adopting the AAC+ audio codec, they have also adopted the MPEG Surround format, which, as the name suggests, allows surround sound to be transmitted.

MPEG Surround uses a very low bit rate stream (about 3 - 4 kbps) to carry the surround sound information, and tests have apparently shown that it performs well — it apparently performs in between the high quality discrete multi-channel and the lower quality matrix-based surround sound formats, which is pretty amazing if true given that the bit rate is only 3 - 4 kbps.


 
 

Add a comment:

Name (optional)
Email (will not be published) (required)
Subject (optional)
Write the word radio in this box
(HTML markup is allowed)

 
 
Bookmark with:
 Digg  del.icio.us  Reddit  Facebook
 Google  Stumbleupon  Slashdot