DAB sounds worse than FM

Planning for the future of digital radio
 
Quality of BBC Internet radio streams to overtake DAB

Home
 
DAB/DAB+
 
Digital 
Satellite
Freeview
 
DRM
 
Internet 
Radio
Tech
 
Software
Downloads
DAB 
Samples
Newsletter
 
Contact
 Us
Introduction to DAB
Incompetent adoption of DAB
When will FM be switched off?
BBC DAB Multiplex
Digital Radio Bit Rates
Wasted DAB Capacity
DAB Around the World
Design of DAB
DAB vs DAB+ technology
T-DMB vs DAB+
Coverage Maps
DAB Summary
 
DAB Radios
DAB CD Portable Stereos
DAB Personal Radios
DAB Micro Systems
DAB Clock Radios
Digital radio via satellite
Satellite Receivers
UK satellite radio bit rates
UK satellite HDTV bit rates
UK satellite TV bit rates
Internet Radio
Broadband Internet Radio
Audio Advice
Aerials
MPEG Audio Coding
Bit Rate vs Audio Quality
MP2 vs AAC+
Audio Processing
FEC Coding
OTA software upgrades
COFDM
Analogue vs Digital Radio
Bandwidth
RF Carriers
Sampling
RF Antennas
Links
 

 

 

   
Introduction to DAB
Incompetent adoption of DAB
When will FM be switched off?
BBC DAB Multiplex
Digital Radio Bit Rates
Wasted DAB Capacity
DAB Around the World
Design of DAB
DAB vs DAB+ technology
T-DMB vs DAB+
Coverage Maps
DAB Summary
 
DAB Radios
DAB CD Portable Stereos
DAB Personal Radios
DAB Micro Systems
DAB Clock Radios

 

Introduction to Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB)

 

The DAB system was designed in the late 1980s, and its main original objectives were to provide radio at CD-quality; to provide better in-car reception quality than on FM; to use the spectrum more efficiently; to allow tuning by the name of the station rather than by frequency; and to allow data to be transmitted. DAB fulfills most of these objectives, but with one rather important exception: DAB sounds worse than FM.

 

Why is the sound quality so bad?

The main reason why there is a problem with the audio quality on DAB is due to the broadcasters using bit rate levels that are too low to provide good audio quality. The reason why they're using insufficient bit rate levels is due to DAB using the inefficient MP2 audio codec, which needs to be used at bit rate levels of at least 192 kbps to provide good audio quality -- FM provides an audio quality which is equivalent to 192 - 224 kbps MP2. Unfortunately, 98% of all of the stereo stations on DAB in the UK are using a bit rate level of 128 kbps, hence the audio quality is poor. This problem of using low bit rates doesn't only affect the UK, either, because the handful of other countries that are trying to promote the old DAB system -- Denmark, Norway and Switzerland -- are also using low bit rate levels.

The reason why such low bit rate levels are being used is because the broadcasters have decided to launch quite a lot of new digital-only stations, but as there is only a limited amount of spectrum available for DAB to use, the broadcasters decided to use low bit rate levels in order to fit these new stations onto DAB even though they knew full well that the audio quality would be lower than on FM.

The broadcasters and Ofcom try to make this out as being a "trade-off", but the reality is that audio quality was sacrificed in order to provide more stations. For example, the broadcasters decided to use 128 kbps for stereo stations, and this allows 9 stations to be carried in a DAB multiplex. If they reduced the number of stereo stations to 8 rather than 9 then half of the stations could transmit at a bit rate of 160 kbps, which would provide a significant improvement in quality, albeit that it would still sound worse than on FM.